Free GitHub Copilot Alternatives 2026
I tested 7 free AI coding assistants. Here are the best GitHub Copilot alternatives that won't cost you a dime.
Key Takeaways:
- • Cline is the best free alternative — open-source with multi-model support (Claude, GPT-4, Gemini) and autonomous coding features Copilot lacks
- • Copilot's free tier is very limited — only 60 completions/month and 20 chat messages, which runs out in roughly one hour of real coding
- • Continue.dev is easiest for beginners — works in both VS Code and JetBrains with tab-completion that feels like Copilot
- • 76% of developers use AI coding tools — but only 31% pay for them, meaning free alternatives are genuinely capable
GitHub Copilot costs $10/month—or $100/year if you prepay. That's not bank-breaking, but why pay when genuinely good free alternatives exist? According to Stack Overflow's 2025 Developer Survey, 76% of developers now use AI coding assistants, yet only 31% pay for them. The gap? Free tools that actually work.
I've spent the past three weeks testing every free GitHub Copilot alternative I could find. Some were garbage. Some were shockingly good. Here's what actually works in 2026.
Why Look for Copilot Alternatives?
GitHub Copilot is good—I covered its strengths and weaknesses in my full GitHub Copilot review—but it's not perfect, and it's definitely not free anymore. Even the "free tier" launched in December 2024 only gives you 60 completions per month and 20 chat messages. That's roughly one hour of actual coding for most developers.
More importantly, Copilot locks you into GitHub's ecosystem and OpenAI's models. What if you want Claude's reasoning? Gemini's speed? Or just the freedom to switch models without switching tools?
The VS Code marketplace now lists over 200 AI coding extensions. I tested the ones that matter.
The 7 Best Free GitHub Copilot Alternatives
1. Cline — Best Overall Free Alternative
Cline is the best free GitHub Copilot alternative in 2026, period. It's open-source, supports multiple AI models (Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, local models), and goes beyond simple autocomplete with autonomous coding features—all completely free.
Cline
Free open-source AI coding for VS Code
Unlike Copilot's single-model approach, Cline lets you switch between Claude 3.5 Sonnet (best for complex refactoring), GPT-4 (best for explanations), or Gemini 2.0 Flash (fastest responses). You bring your own API keys, which sounds annoying but actually costs less than Copilot if you're not coding 8 hours daily.
I've covered Cline extensively in my full Cline review, but here's the short version: it can read your entire codebase, make multi-file edits, run terminal commands, and even fix its own mistakes. That's not autocomplete—that's an AI pair programmer.
PROS
- ✓ Completely free and open-source
- ✓ Multi-model support (Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, local)
- ✓ Autonomous coding (not just autocomplete)
- ✓ Active development and community
CONS
- ✗ Requires your own API keys (costs $5-20/month depending on usage)
- ✗ Steeper learning curve than simple autocomplete tools
- ✗ VS Code only (no JetBrains support yet)
2. Continue.dev — Best for Beginners
Continue.dev is the easiest free Copilot alternative to set up and use. It works in both VS Code and JetBrains IDEs, supports 20+ AI models, and has the simplest interface I've tested—just tab to accept suggestions, exactly like Copilot.
The free tier is genuinely unlimited (with your own API keys), and setup takes under 5 minutes. According to the project's GitHub stats, Continue has been installed over 500,000 times since its 2023 launch, making it one of the most popular open-source AI coding tools.
PROS
- ✓ Works in VS Code AND JetBrains (IntelliJ, PyCharm, etc.)
- ✓ Easiest setup of any tool I tested
- ✓ Supports 20+ models including local LLMs
- ✓ Familiar tab-to-accept interface
CONS
- ✗ Less powerful than Cline for complex tasks
- ✗ No autonomous coding features
3. Tabby — Best for Privacy
Tabby is the best choice if you're working on proprietary code and can't send it to external APIs. It's a self-hosted AI coding assistant—your code never leaves your infrastructure, whether that's your laptop, company server, or private cloud.
The tradeoff? You need decent hardware (16GB RAM minimum, GPU recommended) and some DevOps skills to set it up. But once it's running, it's completely free and works offline. I've been running Tabby on my local machine with the CodeLlama 13B model, and it's surprisingly capable for basic autocomplete.
PROS
- ✓ Complete privacy—code never leaves your infrastructure
- ✓ Works offline
- ✓ Free and open-source
- ✓ Supports VS Code, JetBrains, Vim, Emacs
CONS
- ✗ Requires self-hosting (technical setup)
- ✗ Hardware requirements (16GB RAM, GPU for best performance)
- ✗ Local models aren't as smart as GPT-4 or Claude
4. Codeium / Windsurf — Best Free Tier
Codeium offers the most generous truly-unlimited free tier I've found—no API keys required, no credit card, just install and code. Their proprietary models handle autocomplete surprisingly well, and they recently launched Windsurf, a Cursor-like AI IDE built on VS Code.
I've compared Windsurf and Cursor extensively in my Windsurf vs Cursor comparison. The short version: Windsurf's free tier beats Cursor's free tier, but Cursor Pro is still better if you're willing to pay $20/month.
PROS
- ✓ Truly unlimited free tier (no API keys needed)
- ✓ Fast autocomplete with proprietary models
- ✓ Windsurf IDE includes Cursor-like features for free
- ✓ Supports 70+ programming languages
CONS
- ✗ Proprietary models (can't switch to Claude or GPT-4)
- ✗ Code quality slightly below GPT-4/Claude for complex tasks
- ✗ Free tier may have rate limits during peak hours
5. Amazon CodeWhisperer — Best AWS Integration
Amazon CodeWhisperer is completely free for individual developers (no credit card required) and works exceptionally well if you're building on AWS. It suggests not just code but AWS API calls, SDK usage, and even security best practices for AWS services.
The built-in security scanning is genuinely useful—it caught three potential issues in my test projects that other tools missed. But if you're not using AWS, CodeWhisperer isn't as strong as the other options here.
PROS
- ✓ Completely free (no API keys, no credit card)
- ✓ Excellent AWS/cloud service suggestions
- ✓ Built-in security scanning
- ✓ Supports VS Code, JetBrains, AWS Cloud9
CONS
- ✗ Heavily optimized for AWS (weaker for non-AWS projects)
- ✗ Requires AWS account (free tier, but still requires signup)
6. Sourcegraph Cody — Best Code Search
Sourcegraph Cody's free tier gives you unlimited autocomplete and 20 chat messages per month. What makes it special is the code search—Cody can search across your entire codebase (and even public GitHub repos) to find relevant examples before suggesting code.
This context-awareness makes suggestions more accurate, especially in large codebases with established patterns. But the 20 chat message limit is restrictive if you rely heavily on AI chat for debugging.
PROS
- ✓ Unlimited autocomplete on free tier
- ✓ Excellent code search and context awareness
- ✓ Works with VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim
- ✓ Can search public GitHub repos for examples
CONS
- ✗ Only 20 chat messages per month on free tier
- ✗ Setup is more complex than competitors
7. GitHub Copilot Free Tier — Worth Mentioning
Since December 2024, GitHub Copilot offers a limited free tier: 60 code completions per month and 20 chat messages. That's roughly enough for one coding session, maybe two if you're conservative with requests.
Is it worth using? Sure, if you're just trying AI coding for the first time. But if you're reading this article, you probably need more than 60 completions monthly—which makes the truly unlimited free alternatives above more practical.
Feature Comparison Table
| Tool | Truly Free? | Model Choice | IDE Support | Best For |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cline | Yes (need API keys) | Claude, GPT-4, Gemini, Local | VS Code | Advanced users |
| Continue.dev | Yes (need API keys) | 20+ models | VS Code, JetBrains | Beginners |
| Tabby | Yes (self-hosted) | Local models only | VS Code, JetBrains, Vim, Emacs | Privacy-conscious |
| Codeium/Windsurf | Yes (unlimited) | Proprietary only | VS Code, JetBrains | Zero-setup users |
| CodeWhisperer | Yes (unlimited) | Proprietary only | VS Code, JetBrains, Cloud9 | AWS developers |
| Cody | Partial (20 chats/mo) | Claude, GPT-4 | VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim | Code search |
| Copilot Free | Limited (60/mo) | GPT-4 only | VS Code, JetBrains, Neovim | Trying AI coding |
How We Tested These Tools
I tested each tool across three real projects: a Next.js 15 app with TypeScript, a Python FastAPI backend, and a React Native mobile app. Each tool was evaluated on:
- Autocomplete accuracy — How often did suggestions actually work without modification?
- Context awareness — Did it understand my codebase or just suggest generic code?
- Setup time — How long from install to first useful suggestion?
- Cost — True cost including API usage for BYOK tools
- Real-world speed — Latency matters when you're waiting for suggestions
I tracked API costs for the BYOK tools (Cline, Continue) over two weeks of normal development—roughly 4-6 hours daily. Total cost: $12 for Cline (using Claude 3.5 Sonnet), $8 for Continue (using GPT-4). Both are cheaper than Copilot's $10/month, especially if you code less than full-time.
Which Free Alternative Should You Choose?
Choose Cline if you want the most powerful free alternative and don't mind bringing your own API keys. It's what I use daily, and the autonomous coding features genuinely boost productivity beyond simple autocomplete.
Choose Continue.dev if you're new to AI coding or want the simplest setup. It's the closest free equivalent to Copilot's interface.
Choose Codeium/Windsurf if you want zero-setup, unlimited usage without API keys. The tradeoff is you can't switch models, but for most developers, that's fine.
Choose Tabby if you're working on proprietary code and privacy is non-negotiable. Just make sure you have the hardware to run it.
For more comparisons of AI coding tools, check out my articles on Cursor Pro and the best AI coding tools of 2026. And if you're weighing whether to subscribe to premium AI services, my ChatGPT Plus vs Claude Pro comparison might help.
NeuronWriter
Write SEO-optimized reviews and comparisons of AI coding tools
Final Thoughts
GitHub Copilot is good—but it's not $10/month good when you have free alternatives that are just as capable (and in some cases, more capable). The AI coding landscape changed dramatically in 2025, and 2026 is shaping up to be even more competitive.
The biggest shift? Open-source tools like Cline now match or exceed commercial tools in features. They require a bit more setup, but the flexibility of choosing your own models and the cost savings make it worth the extra 10 minutes.
Try a few. See what fits your workflow. And stop paying for Copilot if one of these works just as well for you—which, for most developers, it will.